- WWE 2K14 ROSTER PROFILES -
#70 - Aksana
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pzzYEXrzOw
GAME STATS
Game Rating: 78
Height: 5'6"
From: Alytus, Lithuania
First WWE Game: WWE 2K14
Edited by Dazmanâ„¢, 25 October 2013 - 08:30 PM.
- WWE 2K14 ROSTER PROFILES -
#70 - Aksana
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pzzYEXrzOw
GAME STATS
Game Rating: 78
Height: 5'6"
From: Alytus, Lithuania
First WWE Game: WWE 2K14
Edited by Dazmanâ„¢, 25 October 2013 - 08:30 PM.
78 FOR SOMEONE WHO KEEPS ON LOSING IS TOOOOO DAM HIGH!!!
she looks very realistic
YES!! Announcer said LITHUANIA, I hope I can use this for my CAW :omg:
She looks good!
Her move-set should just be a headlock though.
AJ 77, Aksana 78 seems legit.
Wow her model looks great and the face is really realistic
She looks pretty good, but a 78? Please! She's the worst Diva in the Ring but has the best game rating?!
Wow. She looks INSANELY good for a debut wrestler in the game. I love that entrance too, I'm sure I'll use that for a female caw
I still don't understand how the hell she's rated 78 and AJ and Nattie are 77
Model + entrance looks great. She's probably the strongest Diva in the company now that Beth's gone, so that could be why she has a higher rating Nattie & AJ. The finisher could be better, doesn't have as much impact as it should. I'm also disappointed not to see that sexy little signature that she does, when she crawls around before kicking her grounded opponent in the face, that would look great if they put that in.
Why is it that pretty much every single diva has at least one variation of a spinning kick?
People make too much out of ratings. When you're playing the game you can't feel the difference between a 78 and a 77. It's not like you're pitting her against the Undertaker. I've played these games for 13 years without ever looking at ratings, with just a general idea of who's good and who's not (which I just assumed from WWE TV). It's always seemed to be accurate. I'm not sure how people can tell who's higher by a point when playing.
^ Exactly.
y2jerichoholic, on 24 Oct 2013 - 7:31 PM, said:
Give that man a cookiePeople make too much out of ratings. When you're playing the game you can't feel the difference between a 78 and a 77. It's not like you're pitting her against the Undertaker. I've played these games for 13 years without ever looking at ratings, with just a general idea of who's good and who's not (which I just assumed from WWE TV). It's always seemed to be accurate. I'm not sure how people can tell who's higher by a point when playing.
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users